I disagree with MonDesire’s views
in “Stripped of More than my clothes”. The main reason is that determining
circumstances of any argument involving airline security or customs has changed
since 9/11. People view the world and security issues vastly different since
this article was written in the late 90’s. Also the authors viewpoint seemed to
come from a purely emotional viewpoint rather than logic and reasoning. It
seemed the author was mainly against the searches because she was a rape victim.
While I’m not trying to make light of any traumatic experience she went
through, if we stopped doing a task because of something that offends someone
or something that one person went through, the human race would not be doing
much at all. The author also seemed to skew statistics to seem in her favor;
which in my opinion further invalidates her argument. The changed perspective
in the new millennium, her emotional approach to her argument, and less than
credible statistics are why I disagree with Daria MonDesire argument.
Even though I agree with MonDesire's you also make a good point that I also agree with so I am very torn!
ReplyDelete